lately there is definitely a lot of debate about technology throughout history combined with a skewed interpretation of the difference between primitive and sophisticated.
I'll offer an example hoping that I do not get drowned in metaphoric commentary on the quality or relevance of my example. I will also take a few liberties with my definitions.
Arguably one of the most enduring and innovative civilisations was that of the Romans. Yet when I ask my self what single tool led to their greatness I come up with two that are complimentary.
Hob nailed sandals and the shovel.
Comments, criticism, etc are welcomed
I really am trying to understand how different people approach these questions
Warwick
Warwick
I'll offer an example hoping that I do not get drowned in metaphoric commentary on the quality or relevance of my example. I will also take a few liberties with my definitions.
Arguably one of the most enduring and innovative civilisations was that of the Romans. Yet when I ask my self what single tool led to their greatness I come up with two that are complimentary.
Hob nailed sandals and the shovel.
Comments, criticism, etc are welcomed
I really am trying to understand how different people approach these questions
Warwick
Warwick
