[www.nytimes.com]
So far, I supposed except for the finger bone, all fragments of Denisovan are skull fragments. Of these, the teeth are basically twice the size of modern humans, the jaw bone is larger than any modern human. One of the artifacts found in the Chinese cave was a stone headband - only it would not fit any modern human as it is enormous. So far, the talk among anthropologist is that "Wow, they must have had huge heads" - only they seem to indicate the heads were out of proportion by today's standards. Sort of like a booble head in proportion to body.
I'm crying BS. I think they have discovered the humungous among us. In other words, perhaps these were the giants of old. I know Andrew Collins has made this point in the past.
So far, I supposed except for the finger bone, all fragments of Denisovan are skull fragments. Of these, the teeth are basically twice the size of modern humans, the jaw bone is larger than any modern human. One of the artifacts found in the Chinese cave was a stone headband - only it would not fit any modern human as it is enormous. So far, the talk among anthropologist is that "Wow, they must have had huge heads" - only they seem to indicate the heads were out of proportion by today's standards. Sort of like a booble head in proportion to body.
I'm crying BS. I think they have discovered the humungous among us. In other words, perhaps these were the giants of old. I know Andrew Collins has made this point in the past.