This one is in response to those looking for a pattern in those BEAM sizes/placement:
These are the calculated areas of the FIRST row of beams looking at the NORTH FACES. [Yes I'll do them all, both faces]
I'm wondering if a better way of modeling the beams might be found by using both FACE areas in some way.
I've also made them rectangular by interpolating the lumps out, but carefully, allowing for some odd initial shapes.
THE VOID VOLUMES CAN BE FOUND LATER USING THE SAME METHODS.
ROW 1 BOTH FACES: See image in NEXT MESSAGE..
3658.0298 in² ----- 3602.6735 in²
3854.7211 in² ----- 4772.856 in²
4493.9689 in² ----- 5058.1759 in²
3895.0994 in² ----- 3672.7988 in²
4295.9908 in² ----- 4113.116 in²
3797.4419 in² ----- 3867.7511 in²
5307.3301 in² ----- 3947.7932 in²
4861.1841 in² ----- 3939.7791 in²
3780.4343 in² ----- 4054.3121 in²
These are the calculated areas of the FIRST row of beams looking at the NORTH FACES. [Yes I'll do them all, both faces]
I'm wondering if a better way of modeling the beams might be found by using both FACE areas in some way.
I've also made them rectangular by interpolating the lumps out, but carefully, allowing for some odd initial shapes.
THE VOID VOLUMES CAN BE FOUND LATER USING THE SAME METHODS.
ROW 1 BOTH FACES: See image in NEXT MESSAGE..
3658.0298 in² ----- 3602.6735 in²
3854.7211 in² ----- 4772.856 in²
4493.9689 in² ----- 5058.1759 in²
3895.0994 in² ----- 3672.7988 in²
4295.9908 in² ----- 4113.116 in²
3797.4419 in² ----- 3867.7511 in²
5307.3301 in² ----- 3947.7932 in²
4861.1841 in² ----- 3939.7791 in²
3780.4343 in² ----- 4054.3121 in²