Does crustal displacement theory invalidate axial procession dating calculations?
“shall we think again about the implications of Hapgood’s theory of earth-crust displacement which allows the southern continent to have been in the ice-free condition depicted by Buache as little as 15,000 years ago?”
Excerpt From Chapter 1
Fingerprints of the Gods
Hancock, Graham
“Posnansky was able to date the Kalasasaya because the obliquity cycle gradually alters the azimuth position of sunrise and sunset from century to century.4 By establishing the solar alignments of certain key structures that now looked ‘out of true’, he convincingly demonstrated that the obliquity of the ecliptic at the time of the building of the Kalasasaya had been 23° 8’ 48”. When that angle was plotted on the graph drawn up by the International Conference of Ephemerids it was found to correspond to a date of 15,000 BC.”
Excerpt From Chapter 11
Fingerprints of the Gods
Hancock, Graham
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn’t any sort of whole crust displacement that would allow for an ice-free Antarctica 15000 years ago invalidate any obliquity of the ecliptic calculations dating Kalasasaya at 17000 years old? Because Kalasasaya would have been in a different location relative to the sun prior to the whole crust displacement?
“shall we think again about the implications of Hapgood’s theory of earth-crust displacement which allows the southern continent to have been in the ice-free condition depicted by Buache as little as 15,000 years ago?”
Excerpt From Chapter 1
Fingerprints of the Gods
Hancock, Graham
“Posnansky was able to date the Kalasasaya because the obliquity cycle gradually alters the azimuth position of sunrise and sunset from century to century.4 By establishing the solar alignments of certain key structures that now looked ‘out of true’, he convincingly demonstrated that the obliquity of the ecliptic at the time of the building of the Kalasasaya had been 23° 8’ 48”. When that angle was plotted on the graph drawn up by the International Conference of Ephemerids it was found to correspond to a date of 15,000 BC.”
Excerpt From Chapter 11
Fingerprints of the Gods
Hancock, Graham
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn’t any sort of whole crust displacement that would allow for an ice-free Antarctica 15000 years ago invalidate any obliquity of the ecliptic calculations dating Kalasasaya at 17000 years old? Because Kalasasaya would have been in a different location relative to the sun prior to the whole crust displacement?