This debate illustrates Hancocks skill in presenting his arguments when subjected to a pretty aggressive attempt to refute them.
While far from agreeing with all GH's theories, I have to admire the sheer breadth of his knowledge on this and other subjects he presents and debates.
He skillfully and instantly counters everything that a rather contemptuous Sherman throws at him, not with facile single sentence dismissals, but with comprehensive and articulate arguments that leave Sherman grasping.
That mainstream treats Hancock with the contempt and dismissal that they do only goes to elevate his standing when one compares their personal attacks with his patient acceptance of same and his expansive and elaborate counter-arguments.
While Randall Carlson is an expert in his field - and shows it - Hancock is more than up to the task of dealing with the somewhat desperate and at times demeaning dismissal of him and his arguments by a number of 'notable' experts in their field.
Hancocks' in-depth grasp of the subjects he tackles is impressive and leaves many of these experts comments and arguments looking foolish and superficial in comparison.
Long may he continue.
[www.youtube.com]
Link corrected.
While far from agreeing with all GH's theories, I have to admire the sheer breadth of his knowledge on this and other subjects he presents and debates.
He skillfully and instantly counters everything that a rather contemptuous Sherman throws at him, not with facile single sentence dismissals, but with comprehensive and articulate arguments that leave Sherman grasping.
That mainstream treats Hancock with the contempt and dismissal that they do only goes to elevate his standing when one compares their personal attacks with his patient acceptance of same and his expansive and elaborate counter-arguments.
While Randall Carlson is an expert in his field - and shows it - Hancock is more than up to the task of dealing with the somewhat desperate and at times demeaning dismissal of him and his arguments by a number of 'notable' experts in their field.
Hancocks' in-depth grasp of the subjects he tackles is impressive and leaves many of these experts comments and arguments looking foolish and superficial in comparison.
Long may he continue.
[www.youtube.com]
Link corrected.