Graham’s theory about the builders of the pyramids being a lost advanced civilization does not address his ideas regarding who they were and their culture. If “they” were not “aliens” but humans who developed a culture and science 10,000+ years ago, there are several theories that can be offered.
Following our understanding of humans, “They” (the Lost Civilization) would have been highly organized.
“They” following the path of evolution, would have a leader or a group to organize the building. Even if they didn’t need humans to lift and move the stones, there had to be a group to plan the work.
“They” were a large civilization.
“They” intended the strictures to last ten of thousands of years, using the materials that would not crumble due to climate or future generations trying to destroy the pyramids.
Following the primates, there would have been a leader.
They left no pictures or writings because that did not have the guarantee of being understood in the future.
But they did leave all the answers explaining everything. It’s right there but no one is thinking of another method of imparting knowledge.
Whoever planned this strikingly important work would put his name - or something identifying him - on it.
We know the nature of man and definitely there is a “language” on the structures.
So let us think of how they accomplished this. Everything about the pyramids is mathematics. The language is in the mathematics.
I propose that each stone’s size is a key - that can be deciphered - and constructed into a “language.”
There are no paintings in the Great Pyramid. Why? The ancient Egyptians loved decorating every space with stories. Paintings fade, languages come and go, but mathematics survive.
I do not know if every stone has been measured but it is the first step to finding out the language of the pyramids.
If every tiny part of the Pyramid has been analyzed, has anyone considered the size and placement of each stone is intentional for a very good reason?
Victoria Alexander
Following our understanding of humans, “They” (the Lost Civilization) would have been highly organized.
“They” following the path of evolution, would have a leader or a group to organize the building. Even if they didn’t need humans to lift and move the stones, there had to be a group to plan the work.
“They” were a large civilization.
“They” intended the strictures to last ten of thousands of years, using the materials that would not crumble due to climate or future generations trying to destroy the pyramids.
Following the primates, there would have been a leader.
They left no pictures or writings because that did not have the guarantee of being understood in the future.
But they did leave all the answers explaining everything. It’s right there but no one is thinking of another method of imparting knowledge.
Whoever planned this strikingly important work would put his name - or something identifying him - on it.
We know the nature of man and definitely there is a “language” on the structures.
So let us think of how they accomplished this. Everything about the pyramids is mathematics. The language is in the mathematics.
I propose that each stone’s size is a key - that can be deciphered - and constructed into a “language.”
There are no paintings in the Great Pyramid. Why? The ancient Egyptians loved decorating every space with stories. Paintings fade, languages come and go, but mathematics survive.
I do not know if every stone has been measured but it is the first step to finding out the language of the pyramids.
If every tiny part of the Pyramid has been analyzed, has anyone considered the size and placement of each stone is intentional for a very good reason?
Victoria Alexander