Most recent readers of this website will be familiar my point here as relates. This is merely to establish its own thread on that point, with hopes that the merits of the point/theory can be DISCUSSED, and not merely dismissed and diverted from.
The point is: If you add a zero to Plato's timeline, having the destruction of Atlantis occurring around 115k BC vice 11.5k BC, nearly everything adds up, almost perfectly. It would NOT be the first time dates were played with, or documents forged. Isaac Newton caught The Church playing with dates, e.g., adding/removing zeros, changing days to years and vice versa, etc., and guess what? He was ex-communicated! How dare somebody blaspheme 'the gatekeepers' with facts and science!
The point is: If you add a zero to Plato's timeline, having the destruction of Atlantis occurring around 115k BC vice 11.5k BC, nearly everything adds up, almost perfectly. It would NOT be the first time dates were played with, or documents forged. Isaac Newton caught The Church playing with dates, e.g., adding/removing zeros, changing days to years and vice versa, etc., and guess what? He was ex-communicated! How dare somebody blaspheme 'the gatekeepers' with facts and science!
