In this graph I depict the distance error of various Giza pyramid correlations. We find Bauval's belt stars of Orion, as also the three pyramid mountain triads I go over in my two books. Then we have the three planet alignment. The mountain and star alignment errors are constant from day to day. The planets though change positions because they travel with different speeds around the Sun. In the graph I depict the error on the day of birth and the previous day and the next day.
![]()
It is interesting to see when the error goes to zero on that day. It turns out there is an alignment with a celestial body at upper culmination.
This leads us to an accurate solution for the Giza pyramid ground plan.
Apart from the pyramid distance ratio, the other factor that contributes to an accurate mapping – celestial depiction, is the angle formed at the central celestial body or equivalently at the Khafre pyramid. The Orion to Giza angle error is a whopping 4.231 degrees. This translates to a linear length error of 34.7 meters or 114 feet.
Clive Ross’s Giza to Mars planetary orbital period – angular correlation leads to a linear length error of roughly one Egyptian royal cubit. This error is quite small.
But Clive Ross’s theory was not a complete one. It did not account for the relative distance of the outer Giza pyramids in regards to the central Khafre pyramid.
This is where my planetary theory offers a perfect mathematical match. The air shafts encode the time of this alignment. The error based on my measurements is only 0.005 meters or a fifth of an inch! The linear distance accuracy is therefore 7,502 times larger than Bauval's Orion Correlation theory!
Tools used:
Google Earth Pro 7.3.6.9345
Stellarium 23.2 astronomy software using ephemeris settings DE440, DE441, DE430, DE431
Where, Precisely, are the Three Pyramids of Giza? - By Glen Dash, Glen Dash Foundation for Archaeological Research
Javascript Great Circle Calculator By Ed Williams:
[edwilliams.org]
Settings set to: Earth model spherical , distance units: km
Assigned planetary angular altitude to latitude and azimuth to longitude after shifting to a value less than 180 degrees.
The altitude of the planets was measured with no atmosphere(zero refraction).
It is interesting to see when the error goes to zero on that day. It turns out there is an alignment with a celestial body at upper culmination.
This leads us to an accurate solution for the Giza pyramid ground plan.
Apart from the pyramid distance ratio, the other factor that contributes to an accurate mapping – celestial depiction, is the angle formed at the central celestial body or equivalently at the Khafre pyramid. The Orion to Giza angle error is a whopping 4.231 degrees. This translates to a linear length error of 34.7 meters or 114 feet.
Clive Ross’s Giza to Mars planetary orbital period – angular correlation leads to a linear length error of roughly one Egyptian royal cubit. This error is quite small.
But Clive Ross’s theory was not a complete one. It did not account for the relative distance of the outer Giza pyramids in regards to the central Khafre pyramid.
This is where my planetary theory offers a perfect mathematical match. The air shafts encode the time of this alignment. The error based on my measurements is only 0.005 meters or a fifth of an inch! The linear distance accuracy is therefore 7,502 times larger than Bauval's Orion Correlation theory!
Tools used:
Google Earth Pro 7.3.6.9345
Stellarium 23.2 astronomy software using ephemeris settings DE440, DE441, DE430, DE431
Where, Precisely, are the Three Pyramids of Giza? - By Glen Dash, Glen Dash Foundation for Archaeological Research
Javascript Great Circle Calculator By Ed Williams:
[edwilliams.org]
Settings set to: Earth model spherical , distance units: km
Assigned planetary angular altitude to latitude and azimuth to longitude after shifting to a value less than 180 degrees.
The altitude of the planets was measured with no atmosphere(zero refraction).