Tldr; please skip down to the numbered entries where I make statements of fact about the Great Pyramid at Giza, and begin introducing what I believe to be a largely unknown method of scientific analysis
*******
I am a long time on-and-off lurker in the Mysteries phorum, and I have followed Graham's amazing work and a few of his counterparts for awhile. Without Mr. Hancock and all the dedicated people he works with, my own work would not be possible.
I'm not here to toot my own horn though, I simply have input to contribute which I hope others will find useful in their own efforts to decode many of our ancient mysteries.
I'll make statements of fact, then back them up with what I believe to be proof of my assertions.
To do the math yourself you'll need a calculator, preferably a scientific one though not necessary for demonstration, and access to a search engine to look up and confirm related factoids.
I assert that it's already proven and known:
1) The Great Pyramid at Giza, among many things, mathematically encodes the root values of the Precession of the Equinoxes i.e. "zodiac", which is still resonant with modern values although the lengths have changed over time (I believe likely more than once, and will get into it later if people are interested). This fact is not recognized or even hinted at in professional literature so far as I have found:
2) The root resonance of Precession, calculated to be precise by careful analysis of the Great Pyramid and its volume in cubic feet, are only the tip of the iceberg:
3) The root resonance of Precession is one year composed of 360 days multiplied by 25,401.6 years in duration:
4) Adding a duration of 37 mean (not average) Jupiter-Saturn conjunctions to this value, plus the addition of an apparently hidden value in days, near-precisely matches a certain compounded sidereal and synodic monthly cycle of our Moon amounting to inexplicable syncing to Precession
5) That hidden value is equal to the square root of Pi in days
6) "Lunar Precession": the syncing of Lunar Months and Precession based upon the connection between Great Pyramid volume and J-S conjunctions, with the addition of the square root of Pi in days as the hidden key to cracking it, is equal to only 18.9 seconds of deviation over the entirety of 1 Precession cycle i.e "Zodiac". None have dared try to publicly explain the accuracy and precision of these correlations, let alone even risk hinting at in professional literature to my knowledge
There's much more, but I'll see if anyone is interested instead of spamming everyone with seemingly wild claims.
******
-- Calculate the volume of the Great Pyramid at Giza in cubic feet. You need not be an "expert", just take the values you have reason to prefer for GP measurements and plug them into an online calculator. You should get extremely close to 914457600 cubic feet, 99.9% or better accuracy:
-- the root value for the annual duration of Precession, being resonant with the current value as defined by Mercury solar transit, is 25,401.6 years (2x2x3x3x4x4x5x5x6x6x7x7 w/o decimal)
-- GP volume in cubic feet divided by (2^2 x 3^2 x 4^2 x 5^2 x 6^2 x 7^2) = 360 days
-- As may be seen, within 99.9% accuracy the values for GP precession in years are represented by the squares of 1 through 7 (1 can be ignored). You may move the decimal place but it's unimportant since the similarity of these values has nothing to do with multiples of 10, i.e. decimal places to the right of the whole value - they "resonate", basically the resemble each other in a way not unlike comparing two otherwise identical objects of different size:
-- 37 mean conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn (not average): Skyscript UK has a page about calculating the mean value for J-S conjunctions unless it's been taken offline which I hadn't checked yet. Nevertheless, J-S orbital parameters publicly available through NASA turn out to to be quite accurate even though they are only calculated to 3 decimal places. The formula for calculating mean conjunctions is there, and is equal to 19.85929143 Tropical Years, which I have found turn out to be more accurate than one might guess given the output of other related equations. For reasons that are not important to go into now, I still use a duration for the Tropical Year equal to 365.24218967 days, NOT 365.242189 or 365.24219 days, when multiplying by 19.85929143 years to compute a mean J-S conjunctions:
-- Add 37 mean conjunctions to 360 days x 25,401.6 years: 9,144,576 days + (37 x 19.85929143 Tropical Years x 365.24218967 days) = 9,412,953.6902259510245397 days
-- Remembering our mathematical key to finally crack this puzzle, we additionally add the square root of Pi in days to our previous output. I suspect that this calculation was intended by the ancient Builders to precisely equal a certain length of Lunar time as a type of clock or calendar in itself, in order that they coincide at a certain date in the Sothic calendar to which our modern Gregorian is identical:
9,412,953.6902259510245397 + 1.7724538509055160272981674833
= 9412955.4626798019300557272981 days
-- 27.321661547 days x 29.530588853 days x 11,666.666666666 cycles
= 9412955.4624615642485616666666 days
-- Now it's time to subtract one from the other. How many seconds deviation are there between cycles at our present day and time?
9412955.4626798019300557272981 days J-S clock
9412955.4624615642485616666666 days Lunar clock
0.000218237681494060631433333 days difference x 86,400 seconds
= 18.8557356810868385558399712 seconds (our drifting Lunar clock has not yet caught up to the J-S conjunction clock)
If you would like me to share more, please let me know. Consider, I believe it's probable that much, much more has been known to some for a *very* long time, yet there is far more work to be accomplished through the contributions of others.
Besides this P.S. below, more to follow if anyone is interested
-- The length of time required for 1 second deviation between the J-S clock and our Lunar clock to occur, is approximately 419.4039516 24hr days
-- Multiply that by 7 and divide by Euler's number? What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: an extremely precise value for the equatorial radius of the Moon (I have never seen data that generates a value with greater accuracy than what I have provided, it is extremely close to known Lunar radius in kilometers)
-- instead of multiplying by 7 and dividing by e, try multiplying 419.4039516 days by Phi (The value I use is 1.618033988749895 which is rounded with extreme precision) What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: the equatorial circumference of the Moon
-- Instead of the above, multiply 419.4039516 days by (Phi squared x 12 x 27.321661546 day sidereal month. What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: You get 360
-- 419.4039516 / 2 / 2 / 2 / 2 ... ?
-- 419.4039516 / 25,920 ... ;)
Have fun!
(Final edit for clarity, typos and information)
*******
I am a long time on-and-off lurker in the Mysteries phorum, and I have followed Graham's amazing work and a few of his counterparts for awhile. Without Mr. Hancock and all the dedicated people he works with, my own work would not be possible.
I'm not here to toot my own horn though, I simply have input to contribute which I hope others will find useful in their own efforts to decode many of our ancient mysteries.
I'll make statements of fact, then back them up with what I believe to be proof of my assertions.
To do the math yourself you'll need a calculator, preferably a scientific one though not necessary for demonstration, and access to a search engine to look up and confirm related factoids.
I assert that it's already proven and known:
1) The Great Pyramid at Giza, among many things, mathematically encodes the root values of the Precession of the Equinoxes i.e. "zodiac", which is still resonant with modern values although the lengths have changed over time (I believe likely more than once, and will get into it later if people are interested). This fact is not recognized or even hinted at in professional literature so far as I have found:
2) The root resonance of Precession, calculated to be precise by careful analysis of the Great Pyramid and its volume in cubic feet, are only the tip of the iceberg:
3) The root resonance of Precession is one year composed of 360 days multiplied by 25,401.6 years in duration:
4) Adding a duration of 37 mean (not average) Jupiter-Saturn conjunctions to this value, plus the addition of an apparently hidden value in days, near-precisely matches a certain compounded sidereal and synodic monthly cycle of our Moon amounting to inexplicable syncing to Precession
5) That hidden value is equal to the square root of Pi in days
6) "Lunar Precession": the syncing of Lunar Months and Precession based upon the connection between Great Pyramid volume and J-S conjunctions, with the addition of the square root of Pi in days as the hidden key to cracking it, is equal to only 18.9 seconds of deviation over the entirety of 1 Precession cycle i.e "Zodiac". None have dared try to publicly explain the accuracy and precision of these correlations, let alone even risk hinting at in professional literature to my knowledge
There's much more, but I'll see if anyone is interested instead of spamming everyone with seemingly wild claims.
******
-- Calculate the volume of the Great Pyramid at Giza in cubic feet. You need not be an "expert", just take the values you have reason to prefer for GP measurements and plug them into an online calculator. You should get extremely close to 914457600 cubic feet, 99.9% or better accuracy:
-- the root value for the annual duration of Precession, being resonant with the current value as defined by Mercury solar transit, is 25,401.6 years (2x2x3x3x4x4x5x5x6x6x7x7 w/o decimal)
-- GP volume in cubic feet divided by (2^2 x 3^2 x 4^2 x 5^2 x 6^2 x 7^2) = 360 days
-- As may be seen, within 99.9% accuracy the values for GP precession in years are represented by the squares of 1 through 7 (1 can be ignored). You may move the decimal place but it's unimportant since the similarity of these values has nothing to do with multiples of 10, i.e. decimal places to the right of the whole value - they "resonate", basically the resemble each other in a way not unlike comparing two otherwise identical objects of different size:
-- 37 mean conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn (not average): Skyscript UK has a page about calculating the mean value for J-S conjunctions unless it's been taken offline which I hadn't checked yet. Nevertheless, J-S orbital parameters publicly available through NASA turn out to to be quite accurate even though they are only calculated to 3 decimal places. The formula for calculating mean conjunctions is there, and is equal to 19.85929143 Tropical Years, which I have found turn out to be more accurate than one might guess given the output of other related equations. For reasons that are not important to go into now, I still use a duration for the Tropical Year equal to 365.24218967 days, NOT 365.242189 or 365.24219 days, when multiplying by 19.85929143 years to compute a mean J-S conjunctions:
-- Add 37 mean conjunctions to 360 days x 25,401.6 years: 9,144,576 days + (37 x 19.85929143 Tropical Years x 365.24218967 days) = 9,412,953.6902259510245397 days
-- Remembering our mathematical key to finally crack this puzzle, we additionally add the square root of Pi in days to our previous output. I suspect that this calculation was intended by the ancient Builders to precisely equal a certain length of Lunar time as a type of clock or calendar in itself, in order that they coincide at a certain date in the Sothic calendar to which our modern Gregorian is identical:
9,412,953.6902259510245397 + 1.7724538509055160272981674833
= 9412955.4626798019300557272981 days
-- 27.321661547 days x 29.530588853 days x 11,666.666666666 cycles
= 9412955.4624615642485616666666 days
-- Now it's time to subtract one from the other. How many seconds deviation are there between cycles at our present day and time?
9412955.4626798019300557272981 days J-S clock
9412955.4624615642485616666666 days Lunar clock
0.000218237681494060631433333 days difference x 86,400 seconds
= 18.8557356810868385558399712 seconds (our drifting Lunar clock has not yet caught up to the J-S conjunction clock)
If you would like me to share more, please let me know. Consider, I believe it's probable that much, much more has been known to some for a *very* long time, yet there is far more work to be accomplished through the contributions of others.
Besides this P.S. below, more to follow if anyone is interested
-- The length of time required for 1 second deviation between the J-S clock and our Lunar clock to occur, is approximately 419.4039516 24hr days
-- Multiply that by 7 and divide by Euler's number? What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: an extremely precise value for the equatorial radius of the Moon (I have never seen data that generates a value with greater accuracy than what I have provided, it is extremely close to known Lunar radius in kilometers)
-- instead of multiplying by 7 and dividing by e, try multiplying 419.4039516 days by Phi (The value I use is 1.618033988749895 which is rounded with extreme precision) What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: the equatorial circumference of the Moon
-- Instead of the above, multiply 419.4039516 days by (Phi squared x 12 x 27.321661546 day sidereal month. What do you get? I'll tell you what you get: You get 360
-- 419.4039516 / 2 / 2 / 2 / 2 ... ?
-- 419.4039516 / 25,920 ... ;)
Have fun!
(Final edit for clarity, typos and information)