Poster Origyptian claims dozens of times a day there is no evidence the pyramids were built in the "3rd millennium" because he claims Egyptians of the 3rd millennium, or anyone else in the world of this era for that matter, could not have built such things during this time. No tools. No evidence at all. They are too primitive. In fact, according to Origyptian the AE did not even know they were even there or that they were man-made until the time of Herodotus c. 400BC.
But this accepts that evil Egyptologists have it correct in the first place that the Old Kingdom Egyptians date to the 3rd millennium. But if nothing means anything and everything can be whatever despite what is otherwise reasonable facts or common sense then how do we really know this? How do we know the Old Kingdom doesn't date to say 1,600BC instead of 2,600BC? Or 600BC? How do we know the pyramids were not built directly before the Greeks in the 1st millennium given that no one even knew they were there before them? How do we know they were not built by a "lost civilization" of the 2nd or 1st millennium BC? Or maybe they were built in 2600BC, or even 5,000BC, but the OK didn't exist until thousands of years later? Maybe the 1st Dynasty doesn't date to 3,100BC, but actually 2100BC? Or 1100BC?
How do we know the pyramids weren't built c. 1,800BC by the Canaanites or Hyksos? Or c. 1,400BC by the Hittites?
Don't worry about any evidence of the lost civilization or any scientific dating as it has been made clear this is not required or is all wrong anyways.
Can anyone prove the pyramids were not built hundreds if not thousands of years later than accepted?
Can anyone prove the Old Kingdom was really in the 3rd millennium and not the 2nd or 1st?
How do we know? Please, no help from dastardly "traditionalists".
But this accepts that evil Egyptologists have it correct in the first place that the Old Kingdom Egyptians date to the 3rd millennium. But if nothing means anything and everything can be whatever despite what is otherwise reasonable facts or common sense then how do we really know this? How do we know the Old Kingdom doesn't date to say 1,600BC instead of 2,600BC? Or 600BC? How do we know the pyramids were not built directly before the Greeks in the 1st millennium given that no one even knew they were there before them? How do we know they were not built by a "lost civilization" of the 2nd or 1st millennium BC? Or maybe they were built in 2600BC, or even 5,000BC, but the OK didn't exist until thousands of years later? Maybe the 1st Dynasty doesn't date to 3,100BC, but actually 2100BC? Or 1100BC?
How do we know the pyramids weren't built c. 1,800BC by the Canaanites or Hyksos? Or c. 1,400BC by the Hittites?
Don't worry about any evidence of the lost civilization or any scientific dating as it has been made clear this is not required or is all wrong anyways.
Can anyone prove the pyramids were not built hundreds if not thousands of years later than accepted?
Can anyone prove the Old Kingdom was really in the 3rd millennium and not the 2nd or 1st?
How do we know? Please, no help from dastardly "traditionalists".