Hello GHMB,
It would appear that after a 4 yr. interval from the time of my first conclusion regarding the observation that the two main pyramids of Giza, currently named Khufu and Khaphre encoded the gravitational effect of the Solar System in it's entirety on the Earth's precession motion, that no one on this message board has bothered to examine this issue seriously. Perhaps that was due to the somewhat inconspicuous manner in which I presented that observation, mentioned to members found here.
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
That was one enjoyable discussion to say the least. But I'm sure the somewhat frivolous manner of it's presentation might have disguised it's more serious intentions too much. The problem with many of these types of discussions, is that many times we tend to be too smart for our own good and miss the simplest of observations due to that situation. Many members here over the years have looked at those old rock piles from a mostly geometrical perspective and plugged in all sorts of variable figures that seemed applicable to derive some significance from them. That process has been ongoing ever since Sir Isaac Newton originally issued in the age of Pyramidology that a mountain of essays greater than those rock piles has accumulated ever since. His original intent as some here may already know, was that he wished to obtain an accurate measure of the Earth to better calculate his discovery of Gravity at work in the Solar System, and also as he knew, its' effects on the Earth's precession motion. And he had every reason to believe that information was encoded into those big rock piles at Giza, which they do. Unfortunately he would be very disappointed in the measurement results he obtained from that initial expedition of Pro. John Greave's expedition to Egypt. If he were still alive today, the calculation would be a cinche for such a genius as he undoubtedly was.
Don Barone, was somewhat correct in his correlation of the ratio sq/rt. 3 / Phi, as the ratio between G1 and G2, but since he was using modern calculations instead of the older ones used by the ancient Egyptians, he couldn't come to the correct conclusions of the matter. Because what this older ratio really represents is the combined gravitational input of the entire Solar System's effect on the Earth's precession motion. And obviously, that effect would also have a geometrical counterpart as well. But that's enough information I think for one opening topic for anyone still around the rather deserted Mysteries forum to think about for now.
Best regards,
Stephen
It would appear that after a 4 yr. interval from the time of my first conclusion regarding the observation that the two main pyramids of Giza, currently named Khufu and Khaphre encoded the gravitational effect of the Solar System in it's entirety on the Earth's precession motion, that no one on this message board has bothered to examine this issue seriously. Perhaps that was due to the somewhat inconspicuous manner in which I presented that observation, mentioned to members found here.
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
<[grahamhancock.com];
That was one enjoyable discussion to say the least. But I'm sure the somewhat frivolous manner of it's presentation might have disguised it's more serious intentions too much. The problem with many of these types of discussions, is that many times we tend to be too smart for our own good and miss the simplest of observations due to that situation. Many members here over the years have looked at those old rock piles from a mostly geometrical perspective and plugged in all sorts of variable figures that seemed applicable to derive some significance from them. That process has been ongoing ever since Sir Isaac Newton originally issued in the age of Pyramidology that a mountain of essays greater than those rock piles has accumulated ever since. His original intent as some here may already know, was that he wished to obtain an accurate measure of the Earth to better calculate his discovery of Gravity at work in the Solar System, and also as he knew, its' effects on the Earth's precession motion. And he had every reason to believe that information was encoded into those big rock piles at Giza, which they do. Unfortunately he would be very disappointed in the measurement results he obtained from that initial expedition of Pro. John Greave's expedition to Egypt. If he were still alive today, the calculation would be a cinche for such a genius as he undoubtedly was.
Don Barone, was somewhat correct in his correlation of the ratio sq/rt. 3 / Phi, as the ratio between G1 and G2, but since he was using modern calculations instead of the older ones used by the ancient Egyptians, he couldn't come to the correct conclusions of the matter. Because what this older ratio really represents is the combined gravitational input of the entire Solar System's effect on the Earth's precession motion. And obviously, that effect would also have a geometrical counterpart as well. But that's enough information I think for one opening topic for anyone still around the rather deserted Mysteries forum to think about for now.
Best regards,
Stephen